Software that drives your operations.

Let’s discuss your application Explore the engineering case study

Custom

Custom application development

You need a new application

Custom project

Custom application development

We design and build customer portals and internal tools, from the core workflow to permissions, integrations, and launch.

Example scopeA portal for your operations.

CustomerRequest

TeamApprove

SystemsRecord

A shared status.Role-based permissions, confirmations, and visible exceptions.

A useful first release
A complete workflow with tested features, permissions, and integrations.
A foundation you can build on
Code, deployment instructions, and documentation for the receiving team.

See approach and scope

The starting point: We review who will use it, the task it needs to support, and the systems it must connect to.
An initial scope we can test: We choose the first workflow and agree on how to test it with your team. That result helps prioritize the next features.
Getting it running: We define access, data, infrastructure, and who will operate the application. Licensing, hosting, and maintenance are priced for each project.

Let’s discuss this service See a connected operation

Get work moving again

Project

Software stabilization

Your application fails during use

Project

Software stabilization

We investigate application failures, fix their causes, and verify the results so your team can operate the system and keep developing it.

Unconfirmed order · Illustrative example

Scope and termsSoftware stabilization

What the engagement includes

Reproducible diagnosis
The failure, its conditions, and dependencies identified.
Fixes and tests
We fix the agreed issues and test workflows that the changes could affect.
Continuity guide
Code and instructions to deploy and operate the updated application.

Getting started

Authorized access to the code, a test environment, and approved data.
We need steps to reproduce the issue and a technical contact. Before starting, we confirm that we can work with the technology and its dependencies.

How we validate it

We verify the fix with the agreed tests and review the results with your technical contact.
Changes, remaining risks, and deployment and rollback conditions are documented.

Scope boundaries

One application or subsystem, with defined behaviors. Additional changes are scoped before work begins.
Does not include a full rewrite, guaranteed data recovery, or round-the-clock support. It does not guarantee error-free operation or coverage of every technology.

Project

Stalled software delivery

Your release is blocked

Project

Stalled software delivery

We diagnose what is blocking delivery and define a recovery plan with priorities and owners. Implementation is agreed separately.

A release blocked by dependencies · Illustrative example

Scope and termsStalled software delivery

What the engagement includes

Blocker map
Dependencies, decisions, and unfinished work preventing progress.
Recovery plan
Milestones, owners, and acceptance criteria.
Optional implementation
If commissioned: implementation of the agreed milestones and tests under a separate scope.

Getting started

Current delivery status, available code or documentation, and authorized access.
People authorized to make project decisions and resolve dependencies.

How we validate it

Each milestone identifies who is responsible, its dependencies, and how completion will be verified.
If implementation is commissioned, each delivery is checked against those criteria.

Scope boundaries

You can commission the assessment and plan on their own. Implementation requires a separate agreement on the work and acceptance tests.
Timelines also depend on third parties. Does not include unlimited tasks or representation in contractual disputes.

Prepare for the next stage

Project

From prototype to production

Your prototype is about to meet real users

Project

From prototype to production

We adapt a prototype to the expected users, data, and load, with the application, deployment, and operational changes needed for that use.

A user’s first task · Illustrative example

Scope and termsFrom prototype to production

What the engagement includes

Adapted application
Changes for the defined use and users.
Environment and tests
Configuration and checks for the agreed load.
Documented operation
Instructions to deploy, operate, and take over the application.

Getting started

Prototype, authorized access, and an application owner.
Before starting, we agree on users, data, expected load, the operating environment, and acceptance criteria.

How we validate it

The included workflows and operating conditions are tested.
The environment and operating instructions are reviewed with the owner.

Scope boundaries

We prepare the application for the agreed use and load. This does not guarantee that it can handle any volume of users or data.
This is not a security or compliance certification. More users, load, or features require a scope review.

Project

Software handoff to your team

Another team needs to take over

Project

Software handoff to your team

We prepare the team transition by bringing together access, knowledge, and guides. A practical check shows whether the receiving team can operate the system.

The receiving team completes a task · Illustrative example

Scope and termsSoftware handoff to your team

What the engagement includes

System inventory
Available components, access, and dependencies.
Operating guides
The knowledge needed to continue the work.
Practical handoff
Verification with the team receiving the system.

Getting started

We need the required access and usage rights, available documentation, and participation from the people currently responsible for the system.
The team taking over the system needs to participate in the handoff and the practical test.

How we validate it

The receiving team performs the agreed task to verify that it can continue operating the system.
Missing access, dependencies, and knowledge still to be transferred are recorded.

Scope boundaries

We can only transfer code, access, and materials that you have the right to share.
Formal code escrow and ongoing disaster response require dedicated services.

Project

Migration and portability

You need to change platforms

Project

Migration and portability

We move applications or data to another platform and test how they work there. Where rollback is feasible, we define the conditions for returning to the original system.

Changing platforms · Illustrative example

Scope and termsMigration and portability

What the engagement includes

Transition plan
Source, destination, dependencies, and migration sequence.
Agreed migration
Export, transformation, and transfer of the included elements.
Tests and exit plan
Behavior compared across platforms, with remaining dependencies documented.

Getting started

Authorized access and export rights for the source and destination.
We agree on which data and features to migrate, how to make the switch, and when a rollback would be feasible.

How we validate it

The agreed data and workflows are checked at the destination.
Platform differences and feasible rollback conditions are documented.

Scope boundaries

The engagement depends on export permissions and our ability to cover both platforms.
The plan identifies restrictions, features that cannot be migrated, and remaining dependencies. It does not promise identical behavior across platforms.

Keep operations running

Ongoing service

Application and integration maintenance

You need ongoing support and improvements

Ongoing service

Application and integration maintenance

We maintain and improve your applications and integrations within agreed priorities, coverage, and capacity.

An issue within the agreed coverage · Illustrative example

Scope and termsApplication and integration maintenance

What the engagement includes

Prioritized issues
Support for defined applications and integrations.
Planned changes
Improvements within the reserved capacity.
Work log
Completed work and outstanding priorities.

Getting started

An inventory of systems and integrations, access, and someone responsible for setting priorities.
We agree on the systems covered, service hours, request volume, and available work capacity.

How we validate it

Each change is reviewed with the relevant tests and criteria.
Completed work and outstanding priorities are reviewed periodically.

Scope boundaries

We support the agreed systems within the contracted capacity; the service does not include unlimited work.
On-call coverage, major changes, and out-of-hours support require a specific agreement.

AI you can put to the test.

Decide and verify

Project

AI version comparison

You need to decide on a specific change

Project

AI version comparison

We compare a proposed model, prompt, or tool change with your current AI version. Using the same cases and criteria, we recommend whether to adopt the change, revise it, or keep the current version.

Choosing between two versions · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI version comparison

What the engagement includes

Evaluation plan
Shared cases, criteria, conditions, and repetitions.
Documented comparison
Responses retained and reviewed against the same criteria.
Decision brief
Findings, uncertainties, and next steps.

Getting started

The current and proposed configurations of your text-based AI, with authorized access to test both.
Representative cases, criteria, and review of critical cases. If there is no comparable baseline, we prepare it first.

How we validate it

We deliver the comparison, tests, and results, including ties or cases where the proposed version performs worse.
The evaluation is accepted when it meets the agreed criteria for the work, even if the new version does not improve the outcome.

Scope boundaries

The conclusion may be a tie, insufficient evidence, or a recommendation not to deploy. Findings do not extend to untested scenarios.
Does not certify general safety or reliability, or include automatic deployment or unlimited fixes.

Project

AI test suite for your team

You want your team to run the tests

Project

AI test suite for your team

We build a test suite your team can rerun and update, with test cases, criteria, and instructions. We verify the handoff by having a team member run the tests in their own environment.

Tests for the team · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI test suite for your team

What the engagement includes

Cases and criteria
A defined set of test cases and criteria for reviewing each result.
A process your team can run
Tests configured in the agreed tool, with instructions for running them and interpreting the results.
Verified handoff
A member of your team reruns the tests in their environment to verify the handoff.

Getting started

An existing tool, agreed cases and criteria, and a defined environment.
Someone on your team who can learn to run and maintain the tests.

How we validate it

The receiving team repeats, interprets, and updates the agreed tests.
Acceptance is recorded after that verification.

Scope boundaries

We agree on the application and workflows to test. The test suite does not cover every possible risk.
Does not include a proprietary platform or unlimited coverage. Ongoing maintenance is optional and agreed separately.

Investigate and improve

Project

AI incident analysis

You need to understand an incident that is under control

Project

AI incident analysis

We investigate AI incidents that have already been contained. We distinguish findings from hypotheses and propose ways to fix, redesign, or limit the system.

Investigating a response without a citation · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI incident analysis

What the engagement includes

Organized evidence
Logs, changes, and failure conditions.
Focused analysis
Verifiable findings separated from hypotheses.
Options for action
Alternatives to fix, redesign, or limit the system.

Getting started

An already contained failure, available logs, and authorized access.
We agree on the system, the type of failure to investigate, and the decision you need to make.

How we validate it

Each finding is linked to the available evidence.
Facts, hypotheses, and gaps are distinguished; options explain their limitations.

Scope boundaries

We review information about the agreed system and failure without modifying the system.
Emergency response, on-call support, and production changes are commissioned separately.

Project

AI response improvement

Your AI gives poor answers or cites the wrong sources

Project

AI response improvement

We improve weak responses by reviewing your AI’s sources, information retrieval, and instructions. We compare changes using the same questions to see what improves and what remains unresolved.

A response based on an outdated source · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI response improvement

What the engagement includes

Reviewed sources
The assistant’s knowledge, how current its sources are, and its instructions.
Targeted changes
Changes to information retrieval and responses, based on the issue found.
Comparison and guide
Comparable tests and guidelines for updating the knowledge base.

Getting started

We agree on the topics the AI covers, its sources and languages, with authorized access to the information.
A content owner who validates rules and expected answers.

How we validate it

Before-and-after responses are compared on the agreed cases.
The sources used and remaining limitations are reviewed.

Scope boundaries

Improvement depends on available information; it does not create knowledge that does not exist.
We do not guarantee that every answer will be correct. Adding topics, sources, or languages requires a scope review.

Project

AI technical debt reduction

Each change breaks something else

Project

AI technical debt reduction

We fix the configurations, dependencies, and components that make your AI brittle. We prioritize the most consequential issues and test behavior before and after each change.

Coupled rules · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI technical debt reduction

What the engagement includes

Technical priorities
Problems ranked by impact and dependencies.
Structural fixes
Focused changes to the AI system.
Tests and configuration
Verified behavior and identified remaining debt.

Getting started

Authorized access to the code and a test environment.
We identify what is failing, its dependencies, and which behaviors must stay the same.

How we validate it

The effect of each fix on the agreed problems is checked.
Tests review affected behaviors; outstanding work is recorded.

Scope boundaries

We prioritize changes that address specific operating or maintenance problems.
The scope does not include eliminating all technical debt or replacing the entire technology stack.

Stay in control

Ongoing service

Scheduled AI evaluations

You want us to evaluate each new version

Ongoing service

Scheduled AI evaluations

Alverant evaluates your AI versions on the agreed schedule. We maintain the tests, compare results, and track changes so you can decide which versions to adopt.

Version evaluation managed by Alverant · Illustrative example

Scope and termsScheduled AI evaluations

What the engagement includes

Maintained test cases
Updated references and criteria for the covered systems.
Review per change
Test execution and interpretation for the included versions.
Comparative history
Documented regressions and results to support decisions.

Getting started

We agree on the systems and versions to evaluate, the schedule, the review window, and the number of cases.
Access to versions and owners for maintaining reference cases.

How we validate it

Each review retains the configuration, cases, and results used.
Differences are interpreted and the next step documented.

Scope boundaries

The service reserves capacity for the agreed evaluation cycles and test updates.
Evaluating extra versions or fixing the system requires a separate agreement.

Ongoing service

AI quality and cost management

You need oversight of AI in use

Ongoing service

AI quality and cost management

We review your AI system’s quality and cost at agreed intervals. We prioritize adjustments and check their impact within the service scope.

Periodic AI review · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI quality and cost management

What the engagement includes

Periodic monitoring
Quality and cost metrics for the defined systems.
Issue analysis
Recording and review of relevant deviations.
Evaluated adjustments
Changes within the agreed capacity.

Getting started

Authorized access to relevant metrics and logs.
We agree on when metrics are reviewed, who makes decisions, and how much adjustment work is included.

How we validate it

We compare metrics with the agreed criteria and record deviations and our analysis.
We test the adjustments against the agreed quality criteria.

Scope boundaries

The service covers the agreed systems and intervention capacity.
Reviews are periodic, not around-the-clock operations. On-call coverage and major changes require a separate agreement.

Connect your workflows. Stay in control.

Project

Process automation

Work passes through too many manual steps

Project

Process automation

We automate repetitive process steps and route exceptions to the person responsible. The workflow includes rules, tracking, and operating instructions.

Purchase request · Illustrative example

04 / Operate

The workflow records each request and sends notifications; a designated person handles exceptions. Your team receives the automation and its guide.

Scope and termsProcess automation

What the engagement includes

Automated workflow
Connected inputs, rules, and outputs.
Exception handling
Owners and handling for cases that require intervention.
Tests and operation
Verified integrations and an operating guide.

Getting started

Defined process, systems, variations, and volume.
Someone who knows the process, approves its rules, and takes responsibility for exceptions.

How we validate it

Normal workflows and agreed exceptions are tested.
We verify that the workflow produces the expected outputs, keeps a record, and routes exceptions to the responsible person.

Scope boundaries

The scope is a defined workflow; it may use conventional software or AI.
Your team remains responsible for running the department. New processes or volumes require a scope review.

Project

System and agent integration

Your tools do not exchange information

Project

System and agent integration

We connect applications, platforms, and agents with defined permissions and exchange rules. We test the workflow, including errors and retries.

Exchange between systems · Illustrative example

Scope and termsSystem and agent integration

What the engagement includes

Defined connectors
Actions and interfaces between the included systems.
Permissions and errors
Roles, validation, and error handling.
Tested workflow
Integration tests and operating documentation.

Getting started

Authorized access to available interfaces and environments.
We agree on what each system exchanges, who can perform each action, and who is responsible for the connected systems.

How we validate it

The complete workflow and included failure scenarios are tested.
We check that each action uses the agreed permissions.

Scope boundaries

Delivery covers specific systems, interfaces, and actions.
Testing permissions does not replace a full security review. Before starting, we confirm that we can work with the platforms involved.

Let’s discuss this service See a connected operation

Project

Data for AI and operations

Your data is scattered or inconsistent

Project

Data for AI and operations

We prepare the data you need to run your operations or power AI systems. We define how to check its quality, trace its origin, and keep it current.

Data preparation and lineage · Illustrative example

Scope and termsData for AI and operations

What the engagement includes

Prepared data
Sources and structure suited to the defined use.
Quality and traceability
Rules and transformations that preserve the link to the source.
Defined update process
Owners and guidelines for keeping information current.

Getting started

Available sources, authorized access, and intended use of the information.
Someone on your team who understands the data and can agree on metrics, quality rules, and updates.

How we validate it

The agreed transformations and quality rules are checked.
Results can be traced to their sources; unresolved differences are identified.

Scope boundaries

We agree on the sources, intended use, and metrics to prepare. The service can also be delivered without adding AI.
Additional transformations and accounting consolidation require a separate scope.

ONE POSSIBLE SCOPE

Two-source reconciliation

Includes: Defined sources, period, fields, and rules; differences linked to their source rows; instructions to repeat and review.
Getting started: Two exports for the agreed period, stable identifiers, and an owner to resolve exceptions.
How it is validated: Every row has a recorded outcome. The comparison can be rerun and traced to its sources; the responsible person reviews unresolved differences.
Limitations: Does not modify systems or automatically correct records. Does not include a permanent integration, accounting, or proof that a real-world event occurred. A match only satisfies the agreed rules.

Fewer resources. Faster responses.

Let’s discuss performance

Custom

Application performance and cloud costs

Your application is slow or cloud costs are too high

Custom project

Application performance and cloud costs

We find what slows your application or increases cloud consumption. We make changes and compare their effect under the same load and quality conditions.

Example scopeOne query. Less repeated work.

LocateRepeated inventory queries

InterveneBatch data access

Measure the improvement.Same load, same data, and a reversible change.

An implemented improvement
A prioritized bottleneck, system changes, and a rollback procedure.
A result you can compare
Measurements under the same load and quality conditions, before and after the change.

See approach and scope

The starting point: We review response times, resource use, and available billing data to identify a worthwhile intervention.
An initial scope we can test: We define one operation, application, or set of resources. We agree on the test load and quality conditions to preserve.
Keeping the improvement: We deliver the changes and a way to verify their effect. Major migrations or ongoing operations are scoped separately; savings depend on usage and pricing.

Project

AI cost and latency optimization

An AI workflow is too slow or too costly

Project

AI cost and latency optimization

We test cost and response-time adjustments in an AI workflow. We compare their effect under equivalent conditions and against the agreed quality criteria.

Reuse only while valid · Illustrative example

Scope and termsAI cost and latency optimization

What the engagement includes

Baseline measurement
Resource use and response time for the defined workflow.
Implemented improvements
Changes selected from the available alternatives.
Verified effect
Before-and-after comparison under defined conditions.

Getting started

An AI workflow, representative load, and access to its measurements.
We agree on minimum quality and how to calculate cost per result, including failures and review work.

How we validate it

We compare cost and response time under the same load and test conditions.
We verify that the agreed quality is maintained and explain the benefits and trade-offs of each change.

Scope boundaries

Savings depend on load and alternatives; no percentage is guaranteed.
General cloud optimization is scoped separately.

Technical judgment for your next step.

Project

Tool and vendor comparison

You need to choose a tool or vendor

Project

Tool and vendor comparison

We compare tools or vendors against your requirements: results, total cost, and dependencies. The recommendation identifies the limits of each alternative.

Choosing without losing data portability · Illustrative example

Scope and termsTool and vendor comparison

What the engagement includes

Comparable criteria
Your decision criteria and the options we can evaluate.
Tests and total cost
Results, dependencies, and relevant costs.
Reasoned recommendation
A recommendation with its assumptions, uncertainties, and commercial incentives disclosed.

Getting started

A specific decision, buyer requirements, and defined alternatives.
We need to test the options under comparable conditions and understand the costs relevant to your use.

How we validate it

Alternatives are compared using common criteria, with documented assumptions.
The recommendation distinguishes what we verified from what remains unverified.

Scope boundaries

The comparison is limited to accessible alternatives and the agreed context.
Does not replace a contractual review or guarantee the vendor’s future terms.

Project

Technical documentation for buyers

You need to substantiate your product’s claims

Project

Technical documentation for buyers

We organize existing evidence and documentation to support your product claims with buyers. We link each claim to its source, identify gaps, and check which materials you can share.

Existing documentation · Illustrative example

Scope and termsTechnical documentation for buyers

What the engagement includes

Organized evidence
Sources linked to specific requirements.
Document status
We identify each document’s version, whether it is current, and what is missing.
Authorized delivery
Material prepared for the defined recipients.

Getting started

We agree on the product and version to document, its intended use, and who will receive the material.
Available evidence and confirmed access and redistribution permissions.

How we validate it

Each product claim is linked to a source, with its version and update date.
Gaps remain visible and delivery respects the agreed permissions.

Scope boundaries

Access to a source does not imply permission to redistribute it.
Running new tests requires a separate scope.
The documentation does not establish legal validity or guarantee institutional acceptance. The recipient decides whether it is sufficient.

Project

Partner technical requirements review

A partner requires technical validation

Project

Partner technical requirements review

We review a deliverable against a specific partner’s technical requirements. We identify what has been verified and what is missing, then prepare the documentation for review. Acceptance is the partner’s decision.

Access, connection, and logging · Illustrative example

Scope and termsPartner technical requirements review

What the engagement includes

Checked requirements
The partner’s technical conditions applied to the deliverable.
Identified gaps
Documented differences and pending tests.
Review and delivery
Technical material to present to the recipient.

Getting started

We need the deliverable to review and the partner’s requirements, including their version and intended context.
We need authorized access. For specialist requirements, we first confirm that we have the necessary expertise.

How we validate it

Each requirement shows its supporting evidence or what still needs to be met or verified.
We review the handoff documents and identify what the recipient still needs to resolve.

Scope boundaries

The result is a technical review for that partner and that deliverable.
The review does not confer a partnership or certification. The partner decides whether to accept the deliverable.